Skip to content
December 2, 2011 / adgerellis

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: ACADEMIA’S FAILURE

Belgium/Belgique          Eire/Ireland          Greece/Ελλάς, Ελλάδα         Scotland/Alba

“Sticks and stones will break my bones but words will never hurt me”

AMENDMENT ONE

CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION,  OR  PROHIBITING

THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF; OR  ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH,  OR  OF THE PRESS;   OR THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE  PEACEABLY  TO ASSEMBLE,  AND TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT  FOR  REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES.

What is so difficult to understand about  AMENDMENT ONE  to the United States  Constitution?

Any  graduate from high school should be able to understand  that  the federal  government cannot make laws against free speech, cannot  make laws against a free printing press.  What is so difficult to understand about that?

By  legal  extension the  FCC  (FEDERAL  COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION)  has limited what words  go out  over  the  public air waves.  By  what  right  has  the  FCC  to  control  the words  that are broadcast? Presumably,  word  control  justification  is made by  the laws that Congress  made to  establish the FCC.

This is not a quibble at law. This issue is, – does the FCC have the legal right to  control words that are broadcasted on public air waves  as  implicitly indicated by  reading  AMENDMENT ONE : UNITED  STATES  CONSTITUTION?  Clearly  Congress did not give the FCC any  authority to control what words can be broadcast on public air waves.  If any  argument is made that Congress did  intend  FCC  to control  any  words  that are broadcast by radio  or television  can that be construed  to  include  religious  blasphemy/sharia  words?  What comes next, book  burning and a “fatwa” against the  printing press?

The FCC  and by extension the United States Congress is  enabling a clear  violation of AMENDMENT ONE: UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION  by not only limiting free speech and  printing press,  if you will  think clearly. When  argued that the FCC does have the right to control  what words/content are broadcast on public airwaves then , think  does  FCC  have the authority to control blaspheme/Sharia Law.  This is not  legal  minutia. The International Criminal Court has ruled on Sharia Law and World Wide Web connected to automatic printers can print what has been ruled a violation of Sharia Law. Think clearly. The economic good of the United States  depends on even what some religions people believe to  be  blatant blasphemy in print and content. The American  people will become  a laughing-stock,  if it has not happened already,  of  all educated  people  worldwide  when only  ancient  Latin, futuo or French wordsJe baise,  are acceptable on public airwaves or internet , in business, commerce and education.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: